Fig. 1 - The Effects of Aerosols Over the Indian Ocean |
Aerosols are
classified as 'small particles suspended in the atmosphere'. Around 90% of
atmospheric aerosols have natural origins, and include sea salt, dust, organic
carbon from forest fires and sulfurous gases from volcanic activity. In
addition, dimethysulfides from ocean algae can produce sulfate aerosols.
The remaining
10% of atmospheric aerosols are anthropogenic (human induced). Most of these
consist of sulfates and carbon particles from the burning of biomass or fossil
fuels. Sulfates are produced when sulfur dioxide from fossil fuels reacts with
water vapour and other gases, while organic carbon and black carbon are
produced when biomass is burned in land clearing activities. Although aerosols
have a short lifetime in the atmosphere, they are quickly replaced by
anthropogenic activities and wind erosion in dry areas.
The Significance of Aerosol Particle Size
When the size
of aerosol particles is 2 micrometres or less (examples include sulfate
particles and organic carbon), they tend to scatter, reflect and absorb
incoming solar radiation. This tends to have a cooling effect, whereas
particles larger than 2 micrometres (such as black carbon or soot) tend to
absorb outgoing long wave radiation, creating a warming effect.
Aerosols Have a Net Negative Forcing Effect
Radiative
forcing is described as the influence a substance has on atmospheric
temperatures, and is usually quantified in watts per square metre (W/m²). As a
whole, aerosols act to cool the atmosphere, and so have a negative forcing
effect. Indeed, it is estimated that the sulfate aerosols from a single
volcanic eruption can reduce global temperatures by around 0.3°C for up to 2
years.
The aerosols
with negative forcing effects include sulphates ( -0.4 W/m²) and organic carbon
from fossil fuels and biomass burning (- 0.15 -0.25 W/m²). Black carbon,
however, has a positive forcing effect of +0.2 W/m².
Indirect Effects of Aerosols on Climate
In addition to
their direct role in reducing global warming, aerosols (particularly sulfates),
can affect cloud lifetime and droplet concentration by acting as cloud
condensation nuclei. This tends to have a further cooling effect because of
increased scattering of solar radiation.
As a
consequence, some scientists believe global warming may well increase if
measures to reduce future sulfate aerosol production are effective. Author Matthew Mc
Dermott , however, points out that it is more likely that black
carbon from Asian pollution will increase in the future. In either scenario,
atmospheric temperatures are predicted to rise.
Another
indirect effect of aerosols may be their influence on rainfall patterns: while
they can increase droplet formation in clouds, recent studies have suggested
that the nature of these droplets is such that actual rainfall in these clouds
is delayed. As a result, when the cloud eventually forms rain later in its life
cycle, the precipitation is more intense, causing flooding in some areas while
other locations are subjected to drought conditions.
Pollution in China May be Affecting Rainfall in
Australasia
Moreover, the
variations in atmospheric temperatures caused by aerosols may be causing
weather patterns to shift to other areas.The effects of this phenomenon over
Australasia have been studied by CSIRO scientist Dr. Leo Rotsteyn, who
suggests that increased anthropogenic haze over Asia (see figure 1) has
increased rainfall in Australia between 1951 and 1996. This, he maintains, is
caused by changes in temperature and pressure gradients over the Indian Ocean
which have resulted in monsoonal winds moving further towards northwestern
Australia.
The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has recognised these examples
of the more subtle effects of aerosols and acknowledged in 2008 that aerosols
are the ‘dominant uncertaintly in radiative forcing’. NASA have responded to
this statement by announcing the launch of their ‘Glory’ satellite in February.
This craft will use state of the art equipment to monitor the impacts of
aerosols on global temperatures in an attempt to clarify some of the
controversy surrounding these tiny atmospheric particles.
References
CSIRO, 2006, ‘Aerosols
and the Climate’, csiro.au
IPCC Third
Assessment Report, 2001, 'Climate Change 2001, the Scientific Basis' , grida.no
Mc Dermott,
M., 2009, ‘Aerosols More Important to Global Warming Than Acknowledged’,
treehugger.com
Science Daily, 2008, ‘Role of Aerosols in Climate Change Examined’, sciencedaily.com
No comments:
Post a Comment